22 Sept 2010

Kaspersky Vs Bit Defender Internet Security

My Bit Defender Internet security had been disabled because of expiry of license. So i ventured out in the local market to renew the license. However due to unavailability of Bit Defender in the local market, i was forced to buy Kaspersky Internet Security 2010. Came home, uninstalled Bit Defender with a heavy heart and installed Kaspersky.
Initially the interface was very smooth and seemed light. After updating the virus database, i ran a full scan of my computer.. The resource consumption was too high that i could not work my my laptop. I somehow managed to take some screenshots of the processes and CPU utilization (below)


Kaspersky
Memory usage in Kaspersky !

kaspersky 2
CPU utilization while scanning with Kaspersky

kaspersky 3
CPU utilization continued(Kaspersky)


Now, in order to give a fair chance for comparison.. i installed a trial version of Bit Defender 2009 on another laptop and did the same thing. I clicked on the virus database update button and it started downloading new updates;  I also kept Microsoft updates for downloading in parallel .  I was really impressed with the memory utilization it has. Check it out below

bit defender 2
Microsoft update, Bit defender update in progress

bit defender
CPU utilization while scanning with Bit defender
Now you can decide which one suits you better. Imagine trying a product for the first time and logging a ticket for it on the very fist day.
image
Raised a ticket with Kaspersky
 I would love to hear from Kaspersky Lab team soon and decide on what to do with the purchase i have made already. In case i dont have much options, i will go ahead and buy the Bit Defender 2011 right away online.

Disqus

More than one instance of Sumo is attempting to start on this page. Please check that you are only loading Sumo once per page.